To the Editor:

I have been gratified to read the many letters to the editor from local Democrats, in support of candidates for Princeton Council. Most of the letters have been illuminating. Some have undercut their messages (and their candidate preferences) with overheated rhetoric and unwarranted accusations. But the outpouring of opinions is strong evidence of an engaged electorate and a healthy democracy in our town.

Over the past decade, I have worked with fellow Democrats to foster an open and inclusive process for selecting candidates. As a result, we have had competitive Primary elections far more often than in the past. And in the heat of competition, passions may flare, and differences may be exaggerated. To some observers, this process appears messy and unfortunate. But to me, it is far preferable to anything stage managed from behind the scenes.

This year, there are some real differences among the candidates, in style as well as substance. But the choice is not black and white, it’s between shades of Democratic blue. All three candidates are strong Democrats, who stand for the principles of inclusion, equality, and community and the core idea that we’re all in this together. They all supported consolidation, and have campaigned vigorously for progressive leaders such as Rush Holt. They each want to serve their town with dedication, and have track records to demonstrate that commitment.

I will cast my ballot at the PCDO endorsement on March 30, and at the primary election on June 3, confident that whichever two candidates emerge as the Democratic nominees will merit my support next November and beyond.

Dan Preston

Moore Street