March 21, 2012

Princeton’s two police departments are anxious to hold on to the current staffing level of 57 officers once consolidation takes effect. Addressing the Transition Task Force Saturday, March 17, Borough Police Chief David Dudeck and Township Police Lieutenant Chris Morgan urged the Task Force not to recommend that the number be reduced to 51, which is what the Joint Shared Services and Consolidation Commission proposed in its final report.

“I would urge you not to cut back on services,” said Chief Dudeck. “If there’s one area that would concern me the most, it would be the delivery of service. I hope that as we go through consolidation that our delivery of service is not impacted. The citizens of Princeton deserve high-end service.”

Both Chief Dudeck and Lieutenant Morgan expressed interest in discussing with the Task Force’s public safety subcommittee what an ideal number of officers might be. In its report, the Consolidation Commission recommended reaching the level of 51 officers through attrition, over three years. Those reductions would be from middle and upper management, not the patrol divisions.

The Borough currently has 30 sworn officers, while the Township has 27. Chief Dudeck said the two departments have been meeting regularly since the consolidation was passed last November, discussing everything from uniforms to personnel. He likened the blending of the two departments to “putting the Yankees and the Red Sox together and making them one team.

“We need your support to keep morale high, so that when we do form this new team, it will something you can be proud of,” he concluded, adding that the patrol division, “the backbone of the police department,” needs to remain fully staffed at all times.

Lieutenant Morgan noted that while the Township police has a traffic bureau, the Borough does not. With regard to the future, he said, “Our concern is for our residents. Depending on what manpower looks like, is it going to be deployed to downtown and are we going to lose police presence in the outskirts of the new Princeton?”

Mark Freda, who chairs the Transition Task Force, commented that negotiations about public safety should not be limited to financial concerns. “It’s not just about saving money,” he said. “There are services that need to be delivered. The public safety subcommittee will try to draw the best balance they can between services and cost savings, and come back with a recommendation to the Task Force.”

The Transition Task Force will meet tonight, March 21, at 7 p.m. in Borough Hall. The next meeting of the public safety subcommittee is Friday, March 23, at 8:30 a.m. in the Township building.


March 14, 2012

“You’re significantly there from where I sit today,” said Center for Governmental Research (CGR) consultant Joe Stefko at Monday’s joint Township Borough meeting, where he talked about the transition process that will lead to consolidation.

Mr. Stefko, who was also a key advisor to the Consolidation and Shared Studies Commission, said that his presentation was meant to “look out over the horizon for the next three to four months to give you a sense of priorities.”

Using slides to “walk through”Кa “few of the high points regarding the process to date,” Mr. Stefko suggested that the detailed research done by the Commission prior to their recommendation to consolidate provides a “high level context” from which the Transition Task Force and its subcommittees can proceed.

Noting that the baseline study leading up to consolidation began in the fall of 2010, Mr. Stefko acknowledged that some circumstances С particularly a lower number of Township police at present С have changed and would need to be tweaked, and that figures cited are only estimates. He noted, however, that the Commission’s “options report” does not simply provide recommendations; it describes several potential possibilities and how the Commission chose among them. It’s a “very helpful context,”КMr. Stefko said. More than once he pointed to the Commission’s final report as a good “point of departure,” describing it as the “single most valuable resource” at “every level” for the Task Force to use as a blueprint. He spoke of the dangers of “mission creep,” and its capacity to stymie the consolidation process.

Those who did not seem to share Mr. Stefko’s sentiments included Borough Council member Roger Martindell, who was a member of the Consolidation Commission, and Transition Task Force member Jim Levine. Mr. Martindell pointed to consolidation as a “once-in-a-lifetime” opportunity and said that aspects of it should be subject to further exploration. Mr. Levine wanted Borough Council and Township Committee members to provide directives for or against such additional research. On a more conciliatory note, Task Force Chair Mark Freda spoke of the “flexibility” that should characterize any decision-making.

Township Mayor Chad Goerner and Committee member Bernie Miller, who were both on the Consolidation Commission and are now serving on the Transition Task Force, also spoke of the amount of work already accomplished by the Commission. The role of the Task Force, they said, is to serve as an “oversight body” implementing consolidation by, for example, establishing reasonable timelines and assigning responsibility, while continuing to share information with the public. Mr. Miller suggested that the Task Force would be “remiss” if it ventured off course to explore other options at this point.

Comparing the process to childbirth, Mr. Stefko emphasized the pragmatic nature of the Task Force’s work, and the necessity of identifying primary and secondary priorities. At this point, he observed, a parent wouldn’t decide what musical instrument their child will be playing in the ninth grade. They would, however, decide what hospital they wanted to go to for the delivery and, perhaps, pack a bag.

Mr. Stefko also noted that decision-making now does not preclude changes in the future. In 2013 the new government won’t look like the ones that will exist in 2018 or 2025.