STEVE
FRAKT Lake Drive NANCY
MacMILLAN James Court LISA deRAVEL Pickering Circle Co-Chairs,
Princeton Ballet School and ARB Anniversary Celebration SARA
M. NICOLLS Executive Director, SAVE R.
WILLIAM POTTER Attorney for Concerned Citizens of Princeton,
Inc. Whom to Choose? All Four Candidates For Council Receive
EndorsementsWOOD TATE Elm
Road RYAN STARK
LILIENTHAL Maple Street BARBARA
TRELSTAD Westcott Road BETTY
FENTON CURTISS Prof. HOWARD C. CURTISS Chestnut Street GINNIE
and BRUCE FINNIE Western Way JEAN
ROSS, Esq. Markham Road JACK
RHUBART Leavitt Lane CLIFFORD
W. ZINK Aiken Avenue CRAIG
PROVORNY Cedar Lane HELMUT
WEYMAR Westcott Road GLORIA
and JOHN BORDEN Madison Street LETITIA and CHARLES UFFORD Mercer
Road RAY WADSWORTH Spruce
Street
Borough's Proposed
School Tax Scheme Relies on Misguided ProportionalityTo
the Editor: The fiscal woes of the Borough are leading
the Borough Council to new heights of political sophistry, as
exemplified by its argument that Borough residents should pay
school taxes in proportion to the number of Borough children enrolled
in our joint school system (Town Topics, May 19). The logical
extension of this argument is that only those families with children
in the school system should pay school taxes, or that families
with two children in school should pay double the tax of those
with one. After all, if proportionality should be applied between
the two municipalities, why shouldn't it also be applied among
taxpayers within each municipality? We have historically
applied the same school tax rate to all homes in a community because
we recognize that education is a universal public good that benefits
all members of society, both current and future. Because we have
a joint school district, Borough Council believes this principle
of equal taxation creates a disparity in the percent of school
taxes paid by Borough residents as compared to Township residents.
But the indirect result of the Borough's proposal would result
in a disparity that would in effect place more of the tax burden
on families with children in school than those without.
Of course, the underlying issue is the State's inability to develop
a system of taxation that would reduce our need to fund schools
through an inequitable and regressive property tax and thereby
provide property tax relief to all residents. STEVE
FRAKT Lake Drive Princeton Ballet
School Says Thanks For Its Successful 50th AnniversaryTo
the Editor: A special thank you to all who participated
in making the 50th Anniversary Celebration of Princeton Ballet
School and the 25th Anniversary of American Repertory Ballet such
a success. On May 1, McCarter Theater was filled with alumni of
the school, former professional dancers, directors, staff, teachers,
families and friends, many traveling a distance to be with us.
Artistic director Graham Lustig created the evening performance
mixing the past with the present, while featuring the school,
professional company and educational outreach programs, along
with the induction of eight illustrious alums into our Wall of
Fame. Thanks to the many volunteers who helped make it
a special night; to the community businesses that donated food
for the reception and picture frames for the retrospective exhibitions;
and to the many merchants in town who hung posters in their windows
and distributed information. And thanks to all who participated
in the evening's program and those in the audience. We
are proud to have chaired such a milestone event, and are grateful
to everyone who has been involved in any way with Princeton Ballet
School and American Repertory Ballet. We are also proud that this
community embraces our cultural heritage and supports its continued
future journey. A very special "thank you" to all. NANCY
MacMILLAN James Court LISA deRAVEL Pickering Circle Co-Chairs,
Princeton Ballet School and ARB Anniversary Celebration Individual
and Corporate Generosity Helped Animal Shelter Raise $70,000To
the Editor: On Saturday, May 15, SAVE, Princeton's Animal
Shelter, held its fourth annual benefit, Wagtime...Ragtime. This
event raised more than $70,000 to help the homeless cats and dogs
of SAVE. This could not have been achieved without the extraordinary
generosity of the many individuals and organizations that donated
to SAVE in support of this event. The following are a few of the
businesses that made this event a great success: A Bit
of This; Arlington Capital Mortgage Company; Ashton Whyte; Backes
& Hill; Beauty Dreams; Bowhe & Peare; Bristol-Myers Squibb;
ComputorTutorTed; Dahlia Floral Concepts; Deborah Leamann Interiors;
Edinburg Animal Hospital; Euphorbia; Gloria Nilson; Goldman, Sachs
& Co.; Hazel & Hannah's Pawtisserie; Goose & Kim Henderson;
J. McLaughlin; La Terrazza; Mon Visage; Nassau Animal Hospital;
One of a Kind Consignment Shop; The Pet Station; Pins & Needles;
Princess Nail Salon; Princeton Nassau Conover; Betsy Sayen; Stockton
Real Estate; Sumo Sushi; U.S. Trust Company; Frank Wojciechowski;
Woodwinds; The Wooly Lamb. SARA M. NICOLLS Executive
Director, SAVE Lawsuit Against Borough
Challenges Council's Veto of Garage ReferendumTo the Editor:
However the appeals court rules in the lawsuit against Princeton
Borough by Concerned Citizens of Princeton, Princeton voters should
demand that municipal officials engage in a "lessons learned"
analysis of the issues raised in that lawsuit. For example: 1.
Why did Borough Council assume that it had to build such a mammoth
parking garage to accommodate the new public library when only
80 to 85 parking spaces were needed? The 279 spaces provided by
the two lots were adequate to the task; as Mayor Reed wrote in
an April 11, 1999 memo, repaving the lots was the "fallback"
consensus. Moreover, additional spaces could be added at low cost
and little risk without burdening taxpayers with a $13.7 million
project an amount equal to more than $1,000 for every resident.
2. Why didn't Borough Council survey residents' references
before gambling on this massive project? When Herb Hobler submitted
a survey revealing overwhelming public opposition to the five-story
parking garage and equally strong preference for continuing surface
parking, the Council rejected it dismissively but refused
to conduct its own survey. 3. Why didn't Borough Council
know that declaring the areas "blighted" would prevent
residents from having a referendum on the garage bond issue? Council
members had promised garage opponents that they could petition
for such a referendum. But when residents took them at their word,
and collected 843 signatures of registered voters in January 2003
three times the number required to compel a referendum
the Borough vetoed a referendum solely because of the prior
"blight" designation. Later, when confronted with this
contradiction, Council members proclaimed their ignorance of the
legal bar to a referendum which they had voted. 4. Finally,
is the parking garage, in fact, "self-financing" through
user fees? At oral argument in the appeals court, the Borough's
lawyer asserted that financing the garage depends on payments
from the planned five-story apartment and commercial complex for
the Tulane Street lot that was declared tax exempt. But the Borough
had assured residents at the December 17, 2002 public hearing
that the garage will pay for itself in user fees, as the Borough
also told the state "Local Finance Board." Which is
it, self-financing or dependent on the payments in lieu of taxes
from another development? These are among questions about
this project and the process leading up to it that should be investigated
no matter what happens with Concerned Citizens of Princeton's
appeal of the Borough's veto of the promised referendum on the
$13.7 million bond issue, a veto based solely on the bizarre "blight"
declaration as hidden under the euphemism "area in
need of redevelopment" for two parking lots that were
serving the community for 40 years and producing a half-million
dollars a year in Borough revenues at no risk to taxpayers. R.
WILLIAM POTTER Attorney for Concerned Citizens of Princeton,
Inc. Whom to Choose? All Four Candidates For Council Receive
EndorsementsTo the Editor:
The real election for Borough Council happens on June 8. The candidates
selected in the Democratic Primary will most likely be sitting
on Princeton Borough Council come January 1, 2005. Voting in this
primary will help decide how the Council deals with the public
for years to come. I feel that all of the four Democratic
candidates are good people. However, I strongly urge Democratic
voters to (a) vote in the primary and (b) choose Mark Freda as
one of their two selections. He is effective and will actually
get things done. He is motivated by doing what is best for the
community, as illustrated by his service as a volunteer fireman.
His record during his previous years as a Councilman shows that
he is the best of the field and deserves our votes. WOOD
TATE Elm Road To the Editor:
I support Roger Martindell for re-election to Borough
Council because he is a tireless advocate for Borough residents.
I know Mr. Martindell as a running mate, fellow Council member,
and friend. He is a fiscally responsible and socially conscious
public servant. On the fiscal side, he not only protects Borough
taxpayers by fighting wasteful spending and exploring alternative
revenue sources, he also saves the Borough countless dollars by
reading the fine print of municipal contracts and service agreements.
His attention to detail and legal training often illuminate issues
that help the Borough dodge major financial headaches.
On the social side, he relentlessly advocates for Princeton's
most vulnerable residents. From lifelong Princetonians, who fear
that skyrocketing property taxes may force them from their homes,
to Princeton's newest immigrants, who confront abusive landlords
and employers, Mr. Martindell offers an empowering voice and seeks
meaningful solutions. On June 8, Borough voters have an
opportunity to choose a candidate who will keep Princeton a quality
town for Borough residents Roger Martindell. RYAN
STARK LILIENTHAL Maple Street To
the Editor: I am writing in support of Anne Neumann's candidacy
for Borough Council. Ms. Neumann has the perspective of having
grown up in the Borough and of one who has lived as far away as
Australia. She is a scholar who brings new ideas to the table.
She is aware that it takes a great deal of time and effort to
be an effective member of Borough Council. It is indeed wonderful
that we as Borough residents have four candidates willing to commit
their energies to the betterment of all of us. Creative
thinking, tempered by discussion, is always an asset. We would
all prosper if there were more affordable housing for seniors
as well as for transient workers who come to Princeton to live
and work. Ms. Neumann has proposed some new thinking on this subject.
This is just one of her interesting ideas. Please consider
a vote for Ms. Neumann on June 8. BARBARA
TRELSTAD Westcott Road To
the Editor: This letter urges our fellow Princeton Borough
residents to vote for Andrew Koontz in the upcoming primary election.
We feel that his continued service on Borough Council would be
of great benefit to the community. "The fiscal crisis"
in the Borough, as he calls it, has commanded much of his attention
since he joined Borough Council at the beginning of the year.
As outlined in his contribution to the Candidates' Forum published
recently in the local papers, he has developed a detailed approach,
encompassing a series of proposals to counter the current financial
situation in the Borough leading to taxpayer relief. One
of his main arguments that Borough expenditures must be reduced
can contribute to a bright and fiscally sound future for Princeton.
We have a diverse community with inhabitants who contribute in
many different ways: artists, teachers, volunteers, employers,
and employees. All have created an attractive place in which to
live and raise our children. We deserve and desire to be able
to remain a part of this community, which this candidate's approach
can make possible. As a lifetime and a longtime resident,
we strongly urge Princetonians to join us in voting for Andrew
Koontz on June 8. BETTY FENTON CURTISS Prof.
HOWARD C. CURTISS Chestnut Street To
the Editor: How refreshing and encouraging it is to see
a real Democratic primary race for Princeton Borough Council,
with four candidates running at once! Thanks to each of them for
wanting to serve. But when we look at what we hope will happen
on the Council, we see one candidate who has shown us how committed
to the community and how very much in touch with community sentiment
he is. He is Mark Freda. As we know from past experience, he isn't
afraid to engage the public fully in Council discussions and decision
processes. We strongly urge our fellow Borough residents
to vote for Mark Freda. GINNIE and BRUCE FINNIE Western
Way To the Editor:
I am writing in support of the candidacy of Roger Martindell for
re-election to the Borough Council. I am a lawyer in Princeton
Borough specializing in mental health law and involved in both
civil rights and social services issues and programs. I find Mr.
Martindell to be a vocal advocate for people whose voices need
to be heard by local government in these areas. As an attorney,
Mr. Martindell has defended tenants in Princeton against unscrupulous
landlords and has defended workers who live in Princeton against
employers who violate workers' rights to a legal wage. In the
social service arena he has advocated for the delivery of translation
and housing services and founded the Borough's Homeless Housing
Trust Fund, which serves as an emergency fund for the homeless
in town. When proposals come before the Borough Council
which implicate civil rights or social service concerns, Mr. Martindell
carefully considers and articulates the potential effect of those
proposals on the less powerful members of our community, those
least able to access local government. Whenever I have sought
support for the interests of such persons I have consistently
found him to be responsive, principled, humane, and effective. JEAN
ROSS, Esq. Markham Road To
the Editor: I am writing to share my thoughts on the upcoming
Democratic Primary for Princeton Borough Council on June 8. My
wife and I will be voting for Mark Freda. I first met Mr.
Freda when he joined the Princeton Fire Department in 1974. I
have known him ever since. He was an officer in the Fire Department
for 11 years, rising to the position of Chief of the Department.
For an almost matching period of time he has been a member of
the Princeton First Aid & Rescue Squad, serving five years
as president there. Mr. Freda has lived in the Borough
all his life. He has been active in many local organizations.
But I think one of his best services to our community were his
13 years on Borough Council from 1986 to 1999. I, and many others,
always saw him as a voice of reason on Council someone
who used common sense, logic, and a lifelong knowledge of the
community and its residents to resolve problems and get things
done. While others talked about it, he did something about it.
I want someone on Council who really reflects my feelings and
thoughts. I want someone on Council who will listen to me and
make sure my view points are considered. That is one promise
that Mr. Freda makes to us, and I know it is a promise that will
be kept. JACK RHUBART Leavitt Lane To
the Editor: During his years of service on Borough Council,
Roger Martindell has consistently shown the courage to challenge
assumptions, raise compelling questions, and present innovative
alternatives to benefit Borough residents and taxpayers. He was
the member of Council who most rigorously questioned the financing
and traffic impacts of the downtown redevelopment with the premise
that the taxpayers deserved a better deal than the one first offered
by the developers. In the past several years, Mr. Martindell
has repeatedly sought ways to temper the unsustainable growth
of the municipal budget and its alarmingly increasing burden on
taxpayers. He has repeatedly pressed the University and the Seminary
to contribute their fair share to support the municipal services
that their students, faculty, and staff all enjoy at taxpayer
expense. He has also championed a significant increase in sharing
services with the Township to improve efficiency and to save money
for the residents of both municipalities, particularly in the
police and public works departments. Fluent in Spanish,
Mr. Martindell has assisted many of Princeton's Hispanic immigrants
with legal and social issues that can be difficult for them. He
has also shown leadership in working on regional issues affecting
all the residents of Mercer County. In the coming years,
budget, governance, and diversity issues will be paramount in
the Borough, and Mr. Martindell's experience, courage, and vision
will contribute greatly to addressing these for the benefit of
the residents and taxpayers. CLIFFORD W. ZINK Aiken
Avenue To the Editor:
I am writing in support of Andrew Koontz in the upcoming primary
election on June 8 as the Democratic candidate for Princeton Borough
Council. Mr. Koontz has been a resident of Princeton Borough
for almost 12 years, and has achieved a deserved reputation as
a tireless worker for his constituents, evidenced during his two-year
term as president of the Princeton Democratic Community Organization,
during which time he was responsible for bringing more Princeton
Borough and Township residents into the organization. Since
being appointed to Joe O'Neill's seat on Borough Council, Mr.
Koontz has demonstrated a willingness to listen to the concerns
of Princeton Borough residents. Over the next few years, Princeton
Borough needs to address numerous pressing issues, not the least
of which is the issue of what to do about the ever increasing
property tax burden. In the short time he has served on Princeton
Borough Council, Mr. Koontz has brought a fresh perspective to
the budgeting process, pushing the Borough Council to pursue sound
fiscal policies, such as forecasting the budget more than three
years out, rather than one year at a time, so the Borough may
be better at anticipating future budgetary problems. Rather
than looking to raise property taxes as the sole means to deal
with Princeton Borough's budgetary problems, Andrew Koontz prefers
to focus more on bringing property tax relief to Borough residents
by trimming expenses and sharing services with other communities.
He is focused on making Borough government run in a more effective
and fiscally responsible manner. Simply, he is open to new ideas
on how to bring the Borough budget and property taxes under control.
I ask that Princeton Borough residents support Andrew Koontz's
candidacy for a seat on the Princeton Borough Council in the Democratic
primary election on June 8. CRAIG PROVORNY Cedar
Lane To the Editor:
The Democratic Primary for Princeton Borough Council is June 8.
I would like to share with Borough residents why I support Mark
Freda. I have known Mr. Freda professionally and personally
for the last 20 years. I have seen his business abilities at the
former Commodities Corporation, now part of Goldman Sachs. His
general business knowledge, his experience in facilities management
and expense control, and his ability to work well with a broad
spectrum of colleagues are all valuable in the public arena. And
in his previous 13-year tenure on Council I saw him as an elected
official who cared deeply for this community. In forming his own
views he always listened to the thoughts and opinions of others,
a critical ability for an elected official. Mr. Freda's
community experience is extensive. He has served consistently
for 30 years on many boards and in volunteer organizations in
this town. No other candidate can match his local experience.
No one person can solve all our problems; but he will work hard
for us, he will listen to us, and he will represent us. He should
be on Borough Council. HELMUT WEYMAR Westcott
Road To the Editor: We urge Princeton Borough
voters to elect Andrew Koontz to Borough Council on June 8. The
present Council made a wise choice in selecting him for the Council
seat vacated when Joe O'Neill became Mayor. We have appreciated
working with Mr. Koontz in PCDO activities and have always found
him a leader, a good listener, pragmatic, and fair-minded. He
has made a point of visiting our neighborhoods, churches, and
events throughout town to talk with people about his ideas and
theirs. Since his selection for Borough Council, Mr. Koontz
has focused on fiscal restraint in an effort to limit the growth
of property taxes. He is ready to take practical steps: multi-year
budgeting to anticipate future challenges, limiting discretionary
spending, and finding ways to share more expenses with county
government. It is essential to strengthen our Borough Council
with someone who brings a new perspective and can defend new initiatives
as we face the fiscal challenges ahead. GLORIA
and JOHN BORDEN Madison Street LETITIA and CHARLES UFFORD Mercer
Road To the Editor:
As a former member of Princeton Borough Council I would like to
state my opinion on the upcoming Princeton Borough Democratic
Primary. l strongly recommend that Borough residents vote
for Mark Freda. I have worked with Mr. Freda on the Borough Council,
worked with him in the Princeton Fire Department, and worked with
him on the Spirit of Princeton Committee. I have known him personally
for many years. In all these arenas he has consistently been a
leader, a doer, a voice of reason. As a taxpayer I want
someone on Borough Council who is in touch with a broad base of
the community. I want someone on Borough Council who will seriously
listen to me and seriously consider my viewpoint before making
a decision, And most importantly I want someone on Borough Council
who isn't there for political reasons. The challenges we face
in Princeton Borough call for someone who will act in our best
interest, free of other considerations. Mark Freda will
work for all the residents of Princeton Borough. He will treat
us fairly, deal with us openly, and provide leadership that reflects
the desires of our community. I hope everyone eligible to vote
in the Democratic Primary on June 8 votes for Mr. Freda. RAY
WADSWORTH Spruce Street
For
information on how to submit Letters to the Editor, click
here. |