JEAN
BALDWIN GROSSMAN President of the Board Princeton Young
Achievers TOM
ROONEY Jefferson Road LINDA
SCHWIMMER Leabrook Lane
Princeton
Youth Achievers Reassures Its Supporters Following Staff ArrestsTo
the Editor: As reported recently, two former Princeton
Youth Achievers (PYA) staff members have been arrested and charged
with unauthorized purchases of computer equipment and office supplies.
We want to reassure our friends and supporters that we were able
to quickly identify and deal with this issue as a result of both
our internal financial control system and the strong community
support PYA enjoys. In the meantime, equipment and supplies have
been returned to PYA. Needless to say, we are cooperating fully
with the authorities as they process the charges. Princeton
Youth Achievers continues to serve approximately 140 students
from low and moderate income families who look to PYA's programs
for educational support. Our two interim Executive Directors,
Larry Fieber (National Distinguished Principal of the Year who
recently retired from Ewing's Parkside Elementary School) and
Warren Schuster (principal of Ewing's Middle School for 20 years)
have infused the program with their strong educational leadership.
The quality and enthusiasm of the teaching staff and volunteers
has never been better; and the program's educational activities
are not only continuing but improving. We thank our many
supporters in the public at large for your continuing support. JEAN
BALDWIN GROSSMAN President of the Board Princeton Young
Achievers Correspondence on Immigration
Case Raises a Question: Who Is Intolerant?To the Editor:
Trust a bunch of lawyers to twist an honest hard-working American's
words to suit their own narrow agenda. Corrington Hwong
(Town Topics Mailbox, November
17) may not have full knowledge of the intricacies of the
law, but the thought she expressed was that of the majority of
Americans. Only a bunch of lawyers could turn an innocent comment
from a concerned citizen into an accusation of intolerance. It
makes one wonder who the intolerant people really are. Perhaps
these same lawyers could publish a list of other behaviors that
are illegal but "not criminal" so that all residents
can take advantage of this apparent loophole in the American justice
system. Perhaps these same lawyers should lay off the Feds and
local police for simply doing their job, and investigate the employers
of illegals who pay less than minimum wage, no overtime, and no
health coverage, to benefit people who could not be bothered to
rake their own leaves. Perhaps these same lawyers could also publish
a list of all the hardworking, family-oriented individuals whom
they claim fill our jails. As a legal immigrant I find
it intolerable that everyone who wants to come to this great country
should not have to go through the same grueling process that I
went through. Corrington Hwong made an innocent, honest statement
that was cruelly twisted by the group of people who have the most
to gain by encouraging millions of scared illegals to continue
to break the law and stay in this country immigration lawyers. TOM
ROONEY Jefferson Road Petitioner
for Snowden Lane Sidewalk Urges Township to Heed Its AdvisorsTo
the Editor: Contrary to some recent reports in the local
press, public opinion on whether sidewalks should be installed
on Snowden Lane between Franklin and Rollingmead is not evenly
divided. Rather, the surrounding community overwhelmingly supports
the sidewalk proposal. In truth, the only solid opposition to
the sidewalks is from the 12 or so families on each side of the
block in question. Their main argument against sidewalks, and
the one that two Council members cited in voting against the sidewalk
proposal, was that it would irreparably destroy the historic,
rural character of their neighborhood. Their other arguments included
these: they don't like change, they don't want to have to shovel
the sidewalks, and their block of Snowden is already safe for
pedestrians. In contrast, in about two weeks time, with
no real organized effort, I was able to gather 94 signatures from
people throughout Princeton who support the installation of the
sidewalk on Snowden. This petition is only a hint at the support
for sidewalks in Princeton. As the experts explained at the November
30 hearing, and as our experience tells us, sidewalks are the
only sure-fire way to separate pedestrians from traffic. Installing
sidewalks encourages people to walk and decreases vehicle traffic,
congested roads, pollution, and obesity. In voting against
the sidewalk proposal, two Council members allowed the narrow
concerns of a few vocal residents to trump the obvious safety
benefits that would inure to the greater Princeton community.
In doing so, they bought into the claim that this portion of Snowden
is a "rural island" unto itself. In fact, the blocks below, above,
to the left, and to the right of the block in question all have
sidewalks. This is truly the missing link block and, thereby discourages
people from walking in the surrounding neighborhood. Moreover,
it is unfathomable how the residents of one block, surrounded
by other blocks with sidewalks and less than 100 yards from Nassau
Street, could assert that their one block is a "rural neighborhood."
Good neighborhoods are places where people care about each other
and want safe, healthy environments for themselves and children
beyond their immediate block. Unfortunately, the November
30 Township vote ended in a two-two tie with one member absent.
I urge all those who support the installation of sidewalks on
Snowden to let the Township know their view and I urge the Township
to reconsider the issue and to vote based on the logical presentations
of the Township Engineer, Arborist, and Traffic Safety Expert,
who collectively presented a solid basis for the sidewalk and
an attractive plan for its installation. LINDA
SCHWIMMER Leabrook Lane
For
information on how to submit Letters to the Editor, click
here. |